While both medical imaging and art involve visual interpretation, their goals and visual structures differ.
Medical imaging aims to reach a diagnosis, typically from a standardized and recurring image format — such as a chest X-ray or CT scan — where anatomy and appearance are expected to follow known patterns.
- Mission of Medical Imaging
The aim of medical imaging is to assess whether anatomical structures are normal or abnormal, and to integrate any detected abnormalities into a coherent, unifying diagnosis.
Art, by contrast, seeks meaning, often expressed through non-standardized, emotionally or symbolically driven forms, where variation is not only expected but essential.Despite their different ends, both domains share a common foundation: they rely on intentional observation, structured inquiry, and visual analysis to find clarity and meaning.
The following flow is designed specifically for medical image evaluation — a process grounded in systematic observation, pattern recognition, and spatial logic — where structure, consistency, and disciplined search enable the observer to discover and interpret findings with insight.
Phase | Description |
1. Curiosity – The Spark |
Curiosity in medical imaging often begins with a clinical question, grounded in the patient’s history, symptoms, or physical findings. It is this question that directs the observer’s attention and sets the stage for intentional engagement.
|
2. Intentional Engagement |
The conscious decision to stop and look — to pause, focus, and commit to exploring the image with purpose. In the context of radiology, this moment often begins with the next case appearing on screen — the familiar mental shift of “Next case…” becomes “I will give this image my full attention.” Intentional engagement connects curiosity with discipline. It invites the viewer to consider:
|
3. Observation |
|
4. In Search of the Units |
The observer now turns to consciously evaluate the visual units within the image. In medical imaging, a unit is a distinct anatomical or pathological structure.
In some cases, as with an obvious mass in the right upper lobe, the unit draws immediate attention and becomes the starting point for analysis. In other cases where no abnormality stands out, the observer must actively search for units using a structured search pattern. Units of the Lungs and heart in a Single CT Slice A chest CT, however, may produce hundreds to thousands of images — requiring the viewer to identify a unit in one slice and follow it across multiple levels. A well-developed search pattern becomes essential. This is a personalized, practiced method that increases visual fluency and efficiency over time. A good search pattern is:
|
5. Unit Analysis |
Each unit is evaluated based on:
This method is summarized by the U SSPCT C mnemonic used in The Common Vein. Using this approach, we assess whether the unit is clearly normal, clearly abnormal, or indeterminate. In cases of uncertainty, further imaging, comparison studies, or clinical correlation may be necessary to clarify the status. Ultimately, the result of this analysis can be summarized graphically — as:
|
U: Unit, |
A unit is an identifiable structure that can be named In this case, below there is a very obvious unit — the mass in the right upper lobe — so we begin the analysis with that distinct finding. |
S: Size, |
The size of a unit — whether measured in absolute dimensions, counted in number, or noted for its variability — carries anatomical and diagnostic significance. In the first example above, we see innumerable micronodules, all roughly the same size, a pattern consistent with bronchiolitis. In the second case, larger nodules with size variation suggest metastatic disease. However, in the appropriate clinical context, they could also represent infectious or inflammatory nodules. Size is rarely meaningful on its own — it gains power when interpreted in context and alongside pattern, distribution, and clinical background. |
S: Shape, | Spiculated nodule
Variations of Lung Nodules and MAsses and their relation to time |
P: Position, | The position of a structure or abnormality within the image often holds diagnostic relevance. For example, disease in the upper lung fields commonly suggests processes like tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, or other inhalational lung diseases.
In medical imaging, positional awareness is essential — not only in relation to the anatomy, but also in relation to the expected patterns of disease distribution. here something is positioned in the image, may have relevance to the diagnosis. For example upper lung field disease often is a manifestation of TB sarcoid and other inhalational diseases |
C: Character, | In essence, character is the structure’s behavioral fingerprint — how it consistently responds to an interrogating force.
For example, an elastic band is defined as elastic because every time a diverging physical force is applied and released, it reliably returns to its original length — this repeatable behavior defines its character. In radiology, a structure’s character is defined by how it consistently interacts with an applied energy or force whether the interrogating force is ultrasound X-rays, changing magnetic fields or radioisotopes. For example a fluid-filled cyst when interrogated by ultrasound waves, will compleytely transmit the sound without reflection resulting in an echo-free structure These consistent responses allow radiologists to characterize tissue types and abnormalities — often forming the foundation of diagnosis. |
T: Time/context. |
T: Time In the evaluation of a medical image, time is understood by comparing the current study with prior imaging. This comparison allows the observer to assess whether a structure has changed over time — such as demonstrating growth (as in cancer or infection), regression (as in response to therapy), or stability (suggesting benignity or chronicity). Understanding time enables us to interpret the natural history of disease, the effectiveness of treatment, or the urgency of intervention. |
C Connections and Associations |
After individual units are analyzed, the next step is to explore their relationships — to see how the findings across units connect and associate, both anatomically and diagnostically, and within the broader clinical context. Understanding these connections helps form a coherent narrative from seemingly isolated findings.
The value of connecting units lies in seeing the whole picture — transforming fragmented findings into a unified diagnostic impression. |
C Comprehension & Interpretation
The Penny Drops |
In this final phase, the entire image begins to reveal its meaning or diagnosis, integrating everything that has come before — from observation and unit analysis to the recognition of connections. The Penny Drops![]() In this final phase, the entire image begins to reveal its meaning or diagnosis, integrating everything that has come before — from observation and unit analysis to the recognition of connections. Ashley DAvidoff MD TheCommonVein.com (140211.8) Comprehension and interpretation are multi-layered processes. They depend on a range of individual factors, including:
In some cases, everything aligns — the anatomy, the pattern, the history — and the diagnosis becomes immediately clear and unmistakable.
But in many cases, interpretation is not so straightforward. The image presents possibilities, not certainties. The observer must weigh findings in context, consider a differential diagnosis, and formulate a working impression.
Ultimately, comprehension is the act of assembling meaning — the final synthesis of curiosity, observation, analysis, pattern recognition, and judgment. |