
Giant Bilateral Atrial Appendages Following Remote Pericardiectomy
A 33-year-old woman from Africa, who underwent a pericardiectomy 30 years ago for presumed constrictive pericarditis, presents with chest pain and a striking imaging appearance of giant bilateral atrial appendages. Both the right and left atrial appendages are markedly dilated, thin-walled, and symmetrically expanded — most prominently along the right atrial inferior border and the left atrial appendage apex. .
The constellation of findings suggests iatrogenic post-surgical aneurysmal remodeling of the atrial appendages secondary to chronic loss of pericardial restraint. Over time, the unopposed transmural pressures acting on the compliant appendage walls, particularly in the absence of the pericardial envelope, have led to progressive dilatation. The process reflects a unique late complication of pericardiectomy, distinct from congenital atrial aneurysm or secondary dilation from pressure overload.
This case illustrates the delicate mechanical relationship between the heart and its pericardial covering — when the restraining “corset” of the pericardium is removed, the atrial appendages, embryologically predisposed to distensibility, may evolve into giant aneurysmal chambers decades later.
Ashley Davidoff MD, TheCommonVein.com (b79945)
Ashley Davidoff MD
30F post pericardiectomy 20 years prior constrictive pericarditis
2. Findings
Dilated Atrial Appendages
![]()
| Finding | Definition |
| Dilated Atrial Appendages | Definition
Comment
|
3. Diagnosis
The clinical perspective focuses on iatrogenic post-surgical aneurysms, specifically in the context of pericardiectomy.
- Giant atrial appendages
| Clinical Perspective | Details |
|---|---|
| Definition |
|
| Cause |
|
| Pathophysiology |
|
| Structural Result |
|
| Functional Impact |
|
| Imaging |
|
| Labs |
|
| Treatment |
|
| Prognosis |
|
4. Medical History and Culture
The Corset Removed Blues
The Corset Removed Reggae
A woman, thirty-three. From Africa, she comes to see. A pain is in her chest. Her history is put to test.
Twenty years ago, a fight. Presumed constrictive, tight. A pericardiectomy. To set the troubled heart wall free.
(Chorus) But the “corset” was unbound. No restraint was to be found. And decades started turning, A lesson we are learning. The loss of that restraint, Left a mechanical complaint. Giant Bilateral Atrial Appendages, The late, post-surgical damages.
The imaging is so clear. A striking finding does appear. The appendages, both left and right, Have grown into a giant sight.
Markedly dilated, thin, Symmetrically, they did begin To expand along the border, A new and strange disorder.
The ventricles are preserved. The valves and vessels, unperturbed. No constriction holds it fast, This echo from the surgical past.
(Chorus) But the “corset” was unbound. No restraint was to be found. And decades started turning, A lesson we are learning. The loss of that restraint, Left a mechanical complaint. Giant Bilateral Atrial Appendages, The late, post-surgical damages.
(Bridge) It’s iatrogenic, we suggest. Aneurysmal remodeling’s quest. The chronic, unopposed duress, The transmural pressure’s stress.
The walls were so compliant, The pressures, non-defiant. Not congenital, not from strain, But from the missing pericardial reign.
(Outro) It shows the delicate, tight relation, A mechanical situation. When the restraining sheath is gone, The chambers may grow on and on. Decades later, we now see, The price of that old surgery.
Etymology
AKA / Terminology
Historical Notes
Cultural or Practice Insights
Notable Figures or Contributions
Examples
Quotes and/or Teaching Lines
|
|
6. MCQs
Part A
| Questions | Answers |
|---|---|
| 1. What is the primary pathophysiological mechanism by which constrictive pericarditis leads to left atrial dilatation and subsequent atrial appendage abnormalities? | The stiffening and restrictive nature of the pericardium in constrictive pericarditis impedes diastolic filling of the ventricles. This leads to elevated left atrial pressures and volumes, driving left atrial dilatation. The atrial appendage, as an extension of the left atrium, subsequently dilates or may become aneurysmal due to these sustained pressure and volume changes. Atrial fibrillation leading to increased LA volume and pressure. Direct inflammatory involvement of the atrial wall by the pericarditis. Reduced cardiac output causing a reflex increase in atrial size. |
| 2. Discuss the embryological development of the left atrial appendage and how congenital dysplasia of the musculi pectinati can predispose to its aneurysmal dilatation. | The left atrial appendage develops from the embryonic left atrium. Congenital dysplasia of the musculi pectinati, which form the ridges within the appendage, can lead to weakened walls and abnormal folding, predisposing to aneurysmal dilatation. The left atrial appendage forms from the primitive pulmonary veins. Abnormal development of the myocardium can result in thinning and subsequent aneurysmal changes. The atrial appendage originates from the sinus venosus. Defects in its septation can cause dilatation. It arises from the epicardium. Overgrowth of the epicardial tissue can lead to aneurysmal formation. |
| 3. In a patient with a history of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis, what are the potential mechanisms that could lead to iatrogenic, post-surgical aneurysmal dilatation of the atrial appendages? | Iatrogenic aneurysmal dilatation of atrial appendages post-pericardiectomy can arise from surgical manipulation, particularly if there was an attempt at appendage ligation or plication that was incomplete or disrupted. Alterations in intracardiac hemodynamics due to pericardial removal, leading to altered stress distribution, or direct injury to the appendage during surgery could also contribute. Residual inflammation from the original pericarditis. Spontaneous development of cardiac fibrosis post-surgery. Development of a new autoimmune response against the pericardium. |
| 4. What are the significant clinical implications and potential complications associated with a dilated or aneurysmal atrial appendage in the context of a post-pericardiectomy state? | The primary complication is an increased risk of thrombus formation within the appendage, leading to potential systemic embolization, particularly stroke. Arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation may also be more prevalent. Increased risk of pulmonary embolism. Development of constrictive physiology in the absence of pericardial disease. Reduced cardiac output due to impaired atrial contractility. |
| 5. What specific echocardiographic views and modalities (e.g., TTE, TEE) are most crucial for characterizing the morphology and function of a dilated atrial appendage, particularly in assessing for thrombus burden and potential embolic risk? | Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is crucial for detailed morphological assessment of the left atrial appendage (LAA), including its size, shape, and the presence of thrombus. Specific views like the mid-esophageal two-chamber view and the dedicated LAA view allow for direct visualization. Assessment of contractile function and spontaneous echo contrast are also vital for embolic risk stratification. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) alone, focusing on apical four-chamber views. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) used during electrophysiology procedures. Doppler echocardiography to assess blood flow velocity within the appendage. |
| 6. Beyond echocardiography, what role does cardiac MRI or CT angiography play in the comprehensive evaluation of an aneurysmal atrial appendage, especially in delineating its relationship with adjacent structures and assessing for associated cardiac abnormalities? | Cardiac MRI and CT angiography provide excellent anatomical detail, aiding in characterizing the appendage’s size, morphology, its spatial relationship to adjacent structures (e.g., pulmonary veins, aorta), and can help identify associated cardiac abnormalities or complications that may not be fully visualized by echocardiography. They are primarily used for assessing atrial appendage function. Their main role is in guiding percutaneous interventions on the appendage. They are mainly used to evaluate the degree of pericardial calcification. |
| 7. How can imaging differentiate between a true aneurysmal dilatation of the atrial appendage and other cystic or mass-like lesions in the vicinity of the left atrium post-operatively? | Imaging modalities like echocardiography (especially TEE), cardiac MRI, and CT angiography can differentiate based on characteristic morphology, continuity with the left atrium, Wall enhancement patterns (in MRI/CT), and the presence or absence of internal vascularity or septations specific to the atrial appendage. Differentiation is only possible with endomyocardial biopsy. All cystic lesions near the left atrium post-operatively are assumed to be appendage dilatations. Fluoroscopy is the most effective method for this differentiation. |
Part B
| 1. What is the primary pathophysiological mechanism by which constrictive pericarditis leads to left atrial dilatation and subsequent atrial appendage abnormalities? | ||
|---|---|---|
| A. The stiffening and restrictive nature of the pericardium in constrictive pericarditis impedes diastolic filling of the ventricles. This leads to elevated left atrial pressures and volumes, driving left atrial dilatation. The atrial appendage, as an extension of the left atrium, subsequently dilates or may become aneurysmal due to these sustained pressure and volume changes. B. Atrial fibrillation leading to increased LA volume and pressure. C. Direct inflammatory involvement of the atrial wall by the pericarditis. D. Reduced cardiac output causing a reflex increase in atrial size. |
A. ✓ B. x C. x D. x |
|
| 2. In a patient with a history of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis, what are the potential mechanisms that could lead to iatrogenic, post-surgical aneurysmal dilatation of the atrial appendages? | ||
|---|---|---|
| A. Iatrogenic aneurysmal dilatation of atrial appendages post-pericardiectomy can arise from surgical manipulation, particularly if there was an attempt at appendage ligation or plication that was incomplete or disrupted. Alterations in intracardiac hemodynamics due to pericardial removal, leading to altered stress distribution, or direct injury to the appendage during surgery could also contribute. B. Residual inflammation from the original pericarditis. C. Spontaneous development of cardiac fibrosis post-surgery. D. Development of a new autoimmune response against the pericardium. |
A. ✓ B. x C. x D. x |
|
| 3. What specific echocardiographic views and modalities (e.g., TTE, TEE) are most crucial for characterizing the morphology and function of a dilated atrial appendage, particularly in assessing for thrombus burden and potential embolic risk? | ||
|---|---|---|
| A. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is crucial for detailed morphological assessment of the left atrial appendage (LAA), including its size, shape, and the presence of thrombus. Specific views like the mid-esophageal two-chamber view and the dedicated LAA view allow for direct visualization. Assessment of contractile function and spontaneous echo contrast are also vital for embolic risk stratification. B. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) alone, focusing on apical four-chamber views. C. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) used during electrophysiology procedures. D. Doppler echocardiography to assess blood flow velocity within the appendage. |
A. ✓ B. x C. x D. x |
|

