2. Findings
Finger in glove
Centrilobular nodules LLL

77 year old female with history of asthma, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) and COPD
CT in the axial plane of the left lower lobe shows inspissated and bronchiectatic segmental airways to the LLL, magnified in the lower image, (green arrowheads) reminiscent of the finger in glove appearance of ABPA)
Ashley Davidoff TheCommonVein.net 227Lu 135157cL
| Finding | Definition | Comment |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Diagnosis
“Finger in Glove”
The primary focus of this discussion is the “finger in glove” sign, a distinctive radiological finding. This section will explore the sign from several perspectives:
| Radiological Manifestation |
|
| Pathophysiological Basis |
|
| Primary Association (ABPA) |
|
| Differential Diagnosis |
|
The clinical focus is on controlling the inflammatory cascade to prevent progressive and irreversible lung damage.
4. Medical History and Culture
The Finger in Glove
Within the lung, a branching tree,
A shadow forms for all to see.
No bony hand, no fleshy grasp,
But mucus, in a bronchial clasp.
Like fingers tucked within a glove,
A sign the radiologists love.
It points the way, a silent clue,
To what the angry mold can do.
Compacted, dense, a stubborn plug,
Where eosinophils have hugged
The fungal threads in tight embrace,
And left this marker in its place.
Additional Information
6. MCQs
Part A — Questions
| Question | Choices |
|---|---|
| Q1. The finger-in-glove sign is most classically associated with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). The underlying immunopathologic mechanism in ABPA responsible for the mucoid impaction is primarily driven by which combination of hypersensitivity reactions? |
|
| Q2. On non-contrast chest CT, the mucoid impaction forming the “finger-in-glove” sign in ABPA can appear hyperdense. What is the primary constituent believed to be responsible for this high attenuation? |
|
| Q3. A 45-year-old male with chronic asthma presents with worsening dyspnea. A chest CT reveals a finger-in-glove sign, central bronchiectasis, and peripheral eosinophilia of 1200 cells/µL. Total serum IgE is 1500 IU/mL. Which of the following additional findings is most specific for diagnosing ABPA over other eosinophilic lung diseases? |
|
| Q4. A 22-year-old asymptomatic female undergoes a chest CT for preoperative evaluation. The scan reveals a classic finger-in-glove sign in the apicoposterior segment of the left upper lobe, associated with distal parenchymal hyperlucency and oligemia. The patient has no history of asthma and a normal eosinophil count. What is the most likely diagnosis? |
|
| Q5. In a patient with a finger-in-glove sign of unclear etiology, MRI of the chest is performed. The impacted mucus demonstrates heterogeneous signal, with areas of very low signal intensity on T2-weighted images. This T2-hypointensity is most suggestive of the presence of what within the mucus? |
|
| Q6. Which of the following imaging features, when seen in conjunction with a finger-in-glove sign, is most suspicious for an underlying obstructing endobronchial neoplasm rather than ABPA or bronchial atresia? |
|
| Q7. While the finger-in-glove sign typically represents mucoid impaction in dilated bronchi, which of the following is an important vascular mimic that can present as branching tubular opacities extending from the hilum? |
|
Q1. The finger-in-glove sign is most classically associated with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). The underlying immunopathologic mechanism in ABPA responsible for the mucoid impaction is primarily driven by which combination of hypersensitivity reactions? |
||
| A) Type II and Type IV | ✗ Incorrect | • Type II (cytotoxic) and Type IV (delayed-type) reactions are not the primary drivers of the allergic inflammation and mucus production seen in ABPA. |
| B) Type I and Type III | ✓ Correct | • ABPA is characterized by a complex immune response to Aspergillus antigens.• It involves a Type I (IgE-mediated) hypersensitivity reaction, causing immediate bronchoconstriction and mast cell degranulation.• It also involves a Type III (immune complex-mediated) reaction, where IgG and IgA complexes deposit in the airway walls, leading to inflammation and tissue damage.• Agarwal R, Clin Exp Allergy 2013 |
| C) Type IV only | ✗ Incorrect | • While a T-helper 2 (Th2) cellular response is crucial in the pathogenesis of ABPA, a sole Type IV reaction does not explain the full spectrum, particularly the role of IgE and immune complexes. |
| D) Type II only | ✗ Incorrect | • A Type II (antibody-dependent cytotoxic) hypersensitivity is not the characteristic mechanism for ABPA. |
Q2. On non-contrast chest CT, the mucoid impaction forming the “finger-in-glove” sign in ABPA can appear hyperdense. What is the primary constituent believed to be responsible for this high attenuation? |
||
| A) Iron deposition from recurrent hemorrhage | ✗ Incorrect | • While hemoptysis can occur in ABPA, significant iron deposition is not the primary cause of the hyperdense appearance. |
| B) Dystrophic calcification of the mucus | ✗ Incorrect | • While frank calcification can occur, it is less common than the general hyperdensity of the mucus. The high attenuation is present even without visible calcification. |
| C) Dessicated mucin, inflammatory cells, and metallic ions | ✓ Correct | • High-attenuation mucus is a highly specific sign for ABPA.• The high density is attributed to a combination of factors including inspissated or dried (dessicated) mucus, a high concentration of inflammatory cells (especially eosinophils), and the sequestration of metals like calcium, iron, and manganese ions within the mucus.• Goyal R, J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992 |
| D) High iodine concentration within the fungal hyphae | ✗ Incorrect | • Iodine is not a known constituent of fungal hyphae that would cause high attenuation on non-contrast CT. This finding is intrinsic to the mucus, not from exogenous contrast. |
Q3. A 45-year-old male with chronic asthma presents with worsening dyspnea. A chest CT reveals a finger-in-glove sign, central bronchiectasis, and peripheral eosinophilia of 1200 cells/µL. Total serum IgE is 1500 IU/mL. Which of the following additional findings is most specific for diagnosing ABPA over other eosinophilic lung diseases? |
||
| A) Positive sputum culture for Aspergillus fumigatus | ✗ Incorrect | • Aspergillus is ubiquitous, and its presence in sputum can represent colonization rather than clinically significant hypersensitivity; it is not specific for ABPA. |
| B) Elevated serum IgG precipitins against Aspergillus fumigatus | ✓ Correct | • The diagnostic criteria for ABPA require evidence of a significant immune response to Aspergillus.• While elevated specific IgE shows sensitization (Type I reaction), the presence of specific IgG precipitins demonstrates a more profound immune response (part of the Type III reaction) that is a key criterion in distinguishing ABPA from simple asthma with fungal sensitization.• Asano K, J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021 |
| C) Migratory pulmonary infiltrates on serial imaging | ✗ Incorrect | • Fleeting or migratory infiltrates can be seen in ABPA, but they are also a classic feature of other eosinophilic lung diseases, such as simple pulmonary eosinophilia (Löffler syndrome) and chronic eosinophilic pneumonia. |
| D) Presence of Charcot-Leyden crystals in sputum | ✗ Incorrect | • Charcot-Leyden crystals are byproducts of eosinophil breakdown and can be found in any condition with significant eosinophilia, including severe asthma, and are not specific to ABPA. |
Q4. A 22-year-old asymptomatic female undergoes a chest CT for preoperative evaluation. The scan reveals a classic finger-in-glove sign in the apicoposterior segment of the left upper lobe, associated with distal parenchymal hyperlucency and oligemia. The patient has no history of asthma and a normal eosinophil count. What is the most likely diagnosis? |
||
| A) Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) | ✗ Incorrect | • ABPA is unlikely in an asymptomatic patient with no history of asthma and normal lab values (eosinophils, IgE). |
| B) Endobronchial carcinoid tumor | ✗ Incorrect | • While an endobronchial tumor can cause a mucoid impaction, it would not typically present with adjacent hyperlucency due to collateral air drift; complete obstruction usually causes atelectasis. Also, carcinoid is less common in this age group. |
| C) Congenital bronchial atresia | ✓ Correct | • Congenital bronchial atresia is a classic cause of a finger-in-glove sign found incidentally in an asymptomatic young adult.• The key differentiating feature is the combination of mucoid impaction (bronchocele) with distal hyperlucency and oligemia, caused by collateral air drift through the pores of Kohn into the obstructed segment.• The left upper lobe is the most common location.• Gipson MG, Radiographics 2009 |
| D) Cystic fibrosis | ✗ Incorrect | • While mucoid impaction is common in CF, it is typically a diffuse process associated with widespread bronchiectasis and other systemic symptoms, not an incidental, focal finding. |
Q5. In a patient with a finger-in-glove sign of unclear etiology, MRI of the chest is performed. The impacted mucus demonstrates heterogeneous signal, with areas of very low signal intensity on T2-weighted images. This T2-hypointensity is most suggestive of the presence of what within the mucus? |
||
| A) High protein concentration and dessication | ✗ Incorrect | • While high protein content and dehydration contribute to altered signal, the profound T2 shortening is more specifically linked to the contents of fungal concretions. High protein alone typically shortens T1 more than T2. |
| B) Fungal hyphae and paramagnetic elements | ✓ Correct | • The mucoid impaction in ABPA often contains fungal elements.• The very low T2 signal is a characteristic finding in fungal concretions (in both sinusitis and ABPA), thought to be caused by the high concentration of paramagnetic elements like iron, manganese, and magnesium sequestered by the fungal organisms.• This creates a strong magnetic susceptibility effect, resulting in signal loss on T2-weighted sequences.• Vitte J, Radiology 2017 |
| C) Hemosiderin from chronic hemorrhage | ✗ Incorrect | • While hemosiderin causes T2 shortening, the morphology is typically more nodular or associated with septal thickening in cases of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, rather than being a uniform characteristic of a large bronchocele. |
| D) Intracellular lipid-laden macrophages | ✗ Incorrect | • Lipid-laden macrophages are associated with endogenous lipoid pneumonia, which has a different imaging appearance (e.g., crazy-paving, consolidation) and does not typically cause this degree of T2 signal loss within a bronchocele. |
Q6. Which of the following imaging features, when seen in conjunction with a finger-in-glove sign, is most suspicious for an underlying obstructing endobronchial neoplasm rather than ABPA or bronchial atresia? |
||
| A) High attenuation of the mucus on non-contrast CT | ✗ Incorrect | • High-attenuation mucus is a specific feature of ABPA and is not associated with neoplastic obstruction. |
| B) Central bronchiectasis proximal to the impaction | ✗ Incorrect | • Central bronchiectasis is the hallmark of ABPA. It is typically seen proximal to the mucoid impaction. |
| C) Focal, avid enhancement of the bronchial wall at the “neck” of the mucoid impaction | ✓ Correct | • Mucoid impaction can be caused by the obstruction of a bronchus by a tumor.• While the mucus plug itself does not enhance, a solid, enhancing nodule or thickening at the proximal end (the “neck” or “base”) of the mucus plug is highly suspicious for an underlying endobronchial neoplasm, such as a carcinoid tumor or bronchogenic carcinoma.• Martínez S, Radiographics 2008 |
| D) Distal hyperinflation and oligemia | ✗ Incorrect | • This combination of findings is the classic presentation of congenital bronchial atresia, not a tumor. Tumors that cause complete obstruction typically lead to atelectasis. |
Q7. While the finger-in-glove sign typically represents mucoid impaction in dilated bronchi, which of the following is an important vascular mimic that can present as branching tubular opacities extending from the hilum? |
||
| A) Intralobar pulmonary sequestration | ✗ Incorrect | • Sequestrations typically appear as a persistent focal consolidation or cystic mass, most often in a posterior basal segment, and are defined by a systemic arterial supply, which is the key diagnostic feature on contrast-enhanced CT. |
| B) Sarcoidosis with a perilymphatic distribution | ✗ Incorrect | • Sarcoidosis presents with beaded, nodular thickening of the bronchovascular bundles and septa, not large, continuous tubular opacities. |
| C) Pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (AVM) | ✓ Correct | • A pulmonary AVM consists of dilated, tortuous feeding arteries and draining veins that can appear as branching tubular structures, mimicking the finger-in-glove sign on non-contrast imaging.• Differentiating features on contrast-enhanced CT include avid enhancement of the structures, identification of a feeding pulmonary artery branch and a draining pulmonary vein, and lack of a true endobronchial location.• Martínez S, Radiographics 2008 |
| D) Lymphangitic carcinomatosis | ✗ Incorrect | • Lymphangitic carcinomatosis presents as smooth or nodular thickening of the interlobular septa and bronchovascular interstitium, not as large, mucus-filled bronchi. |
7. Memory Page
Asthmatic Spores of Aspergillus Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis Finger in Glove Sign Bronchiectasis and Inspissated Thick, tenacious mucus containing eosinophils, Charcot-Leyden crystals, cellular debris, and colonizing Aspergillus hyphae.

Artistic rendering shows an asthmatic man with breathing difficulty. The lungs are overlaid with Aspergillus spores, and a CT scan reveals the classic finger-in-glove sign at the left base. The gloved hand reinforces the concept of mucus-impacted bronchi in ABPA.
Courtesy: Ashley Davidoff MD, TheCommonVein.com (135157c.MAD)

Ashley Davidoff MD, AI-assisted — Memory Image – TheCommonVein.com (135157c.MAD.gif02)
This animated memory image shows a knobbly, rotating hand that metaphorically embodies the “finger-in-glove” sign. The gnarled fingers represent dilated bronchi, while the glove evokes the branching mucus casts that fill and mold the central airways in ABPA.
Though ugly and knobbly in form, this visual analogy crystallizes the characteristic imaging appearance of ABPA-related central bronchiectasis and mucus impaction.
Ashley Davidoff MD, AI-assisted – Memory Image TheCommonVein.com (b79789c-04MAD)
The Fungal Glove
A wheezing breath, a tightening chest,
The asthma patient finds little rest.
Within his airways, a shadow takes hold,
Not just of pollen, but of ancient mold.
Aspergillus spores, an innocent dust,
Ignite the deep tissues with allergic thrust.
The bronchi weep, they swell and they strain
Collecting thick mucus, a sticky, trapped rain.
The CT unveils what the dark lung concea
A tubular pattern, the truth it reveals.
It’s the Finger-in-Glove, a bizarre, branching sight
A bronchus distended, sealed up and white.
The hand of the fungus has grasped what it found,
A mold-laden mucus where air can’t be found.
A chilling reminder, dramatically made,
Of allergic defense in a life disobeyed
The glove is the airway, distended and weak,
The finger is sickness, a shape we must seek.
Etymology of Aspergillus

This image juxtaposes an ornate Christian liturgical implement, the Aspergillum, with the microscopic structure of the mold genus Aspergillus, explaining a remarkable moment of etymological crossover between biology and religion.
The Aspergillum (Latin for “little sprinkler,” derived from aspergere meaning “to sprinkle”) is the brush or perforated ball used by a priest to sprinkle holy water (the rite of Asperges).
The ubiquitous mold genus Aspergillus was named in 1729 by the Italian priest and biologist Pier Antonio Micheli. Viewing the asexual spore-forming structure (the conidial head) of the fungus under a microscope, Micheli was struck by its resemblance to the radiating bristles or perforations of the holy water sprinkler used in church ceremonies.
This dual image illustrates how the physical shape of a religious artifact provided the name for one of the most clinically important fungi, which causes a spectrum of human diseases collectively known as Aspergillosis.
Courtesy: Ashley Davidoff MD, TheCommonVein.com (135157d) and Wiki Commons



